Intelligent Drug Surveillance



Loading...

Best Practices Winner: AstraZeneca
Project: The Safety Intelligence Program
Category: Editors’ Choice
Nominated by: BioWisdom

By Alissa Poh

August 4, 2009
| Good collaborations in drug discovery are often “happy coincidences,” says David Cook, AstraZeneca’s associate director for global safety assessment, when describing the company’s partnership with BioWisdom in developing the Safety Intelligence Program (SIP).

“Back in 2007, AstraZeneca was focusing on how best to affect early decisions in drug discovery; how we could influence the daily decisions our project chemists and pharmacologists were making, and get them thinking about safety assessment. Julie [Barnes] rang me up around then and said BioWisdom was thinking of formulating a general problem-solving approach to toxicology issues in drug discovery. She asked if we’d like to come on board.”

The result was SIP, described as the “largest forever-expanding collection of known chemical effects occurring in different tissues, drug effects on clinical biomarkers of tissue injury, and drug molecular mechanisms.” Currently, SIP contains almost 100,000 individual facts, or “assertions,” related to the liver’s response to more than 5,500 different compounds in over 20 species.

The collaborators began with the liver, as acute hepatic injury is among the most common forms of preclinical and clinical toxicities seen with drugs, responsible for more than 30 percent of all drug withdrawals.

“The word ‘idiosyncratic’ is key in liver injury,” says Julie Barnes, BioWisdom’s chief scientific officer. “Those unexpected, adverse reactions in humans that we just can’t predict, because we don’t know enough of a given compound’s biology, in the context of individual patients.”

“Our project teams always want to do the best job possible, but the mechanisms of retrieving and analyzing information they need are often tedious,” Cook says. “I was thus very intrigued by the application of text logic and mining to the problem of retrieving data of interest from the pile.”

Meanwhile, BioWisdom had begun dealing with the problem of language inconsistencies in medical literature and regulatory documents by building Sofia, an ontology-based platform capable of liberating intelligence from multiple source formats. The coalescence between both companies, then, was perfectly natural, with the idea of exploiting this platform as a foundation for SIP. Sofia was used to generate liver-related “assertional metadata,” which comprises thousands of highly accurate and comprehensive key observations distilled from over 19 million documents and database records.

A key feature of SIP is that these assertions are all rendered in a semantically consistent format, with an accuracy level of 97 percent. “There’re so many ways someone will describe a disease, protein or drug—for example, problems associated with bile excretion can be called biliary stasis, cholestasia, or cholestatic injury,” says Jane Reed, a principle consultant in BioWisdom’s health care sector and team leader for this particular project. “So if you’re trying to work out a particular compound’s side effects, you need to know the different descriptions, which our vocabularies cover. Users can also clearly visualize such diverse information, as our technology pulls it all together.” 

Verb Relationships
In other words, SIP very much highlights the science of ontology. “We use the language of verb forms and their relationship with nouns to sort out what things really are,” Barnes explains, “so in defining an obscure statement like ‘AZ binds BCEP,’ the verb ‘binds’ immediately implicates AZ as the chemical Aztreonam and not AstraZeneca, because companies don’t bind proteins!”

SIP’s nascent form was delivered in January 2008. Its potential was evident even then, Reed says, but it wasn’t applied to AstraZeneca’s business issues until version 2.0—complete with in-depth liver data—was released in September. The program’s improved user functionality helped drive the collaborators’ decision to submit SIP for this year’s Best Practices competition in the Drug Discovery and Development category.

“Really, it just felt like the right time,” Reed says. “But at the awards ceremony, when they announced the winners [Amgen and Genedata] in our category, everyone in our group was disappointed. Then they announced the Editor’s Choice award at the end—we were taken by surprise and thrilled.” 

The collaborators have extended SIP’s focus to the cardiac system. Next, they’ll hone in on kidney issues. Besides such detailed tissue-specific mining as goes into the development of SIP data, Cook says, the program also provides a sweeping glance at all other toxicities within its vocabulary.

“We’re looking to use similar approaches to leverage our internal knowledge,” he adds. “There’s a huge amount of information within AstraZeneca on compounds that went through rigorous testing but never got out into the clinic—we’d apply the same exercise here, pulling out relationships and generating assertions, to learn from our home history.”

Moreover, says Barnes, “we’ve been discussing drug signatures and how to develop patterns from our data that take us all the way into later phases of the clinical pharmacovigilance space.” The opposite end, in effect, of AstraZeneca’s business needs in early risk detection, and an expansion of the safety arena.

“It’s about breaking down the clinical barrier both ways,” Cook says. “How do we translate both forward to clinical situations, then take what we learn and recycle it to the earlier stages of drug discovery, to make sure we’re really using that information to influence the next generation of drug development?”

Ultimately, it’s about generating new knowledge from old, using SIP analyses to form new hypotheses that can then be explored with actual experimentation. “That, I think, is really exciting stuff, because toxicology is such a broad area to work in,” Cook says. “To focus on a few key areas at a time minimizes our chances of charging up blind alleys.”


This article also appeared in the July-August 2009 issue of Bio-IT World Magazine.
Subscriptions are free for qualifying individuals. Apply today.

Click here to login and leave a comment.  

0 Comments

Add Comment

Text Only 2000 character limit

Page 1 of 1

White Papers & Special Reports

oracle_clinical
eClinical Visions - Clinical Trial Management: Enabling Operational Efficiency
Sponsored by Oracle

Read how contributors from Genzyme, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Accenture, Oracle Health Sciences and others address some of the most pertinent challenges facing the biopharmaceutical industry including... Globalization of clinical trials driven by the need to reduce costs and recruit participants; greater outsourcing; escalating regulatory demands; increased trial complexity; and post-marketing studies. Download this paper to gain new insight into:

  • Recent progress made in addressing these challenges
  • Expert opinion on clinical trial management systems (CTMS) for improving trial efficiencies
  • How to cut trial costs and enhance the productivity of trial participants


oracle_RDC
Remote Data Capture – Acquisition and Analysis
Sponsored by Oracle

Today nearly half of all clinical trials are conducted electronically, and rising! Electronic Data Capture (EDC) technology provides industry-wide opportunities, along with challenges, that are being addressed. In this informative report industry experts and users from Pfizer, PPD, C3i and Oracle Health Sciences discuss the impact of EDC and its newest zero footprint; online iteration.  It can used anywhere, world-wide, where the Internet is available while placing greater onus on global trial support. The critical focus of this new technology is that it must support the work of the person at the heart of the clinical trial system– the investigator. Download this report to learn more about:

  • Trends and Issues in an Electronic Clinical Data Management World
  • The New Remote Data Capture Paradigm 
  • Improving and Monitoring Clinical Data Management in the eClinical Age
  • Optimizing and Supporting Remote Data Capture


oracle_video
Technology Video Report: A Day in the Life with Remote Data Capture (Next-Gen EDC)
Sponsored by Oracle
See why Oracle Remote Data Capture (RDC) Onsite is the next generation in electronic data capture with its user-friendly method to collect, clean, review, and verify clinical trial data. Providing unprecedented performance with real-time data capture, Oracle RDC Onsite simplifies source data verification. With a clear, consistent view of study data across all sites, the benefits include reduced monitoring time, decreased queries and discrepancies, and less time to database lock.



Life Science Webcasts & Podcasts

Predict or Perish! Shaping the Practices of Clinical Trials
Decisionview webinarSponsored by:  DecisionView

Predictive Analytics are a key differentiator in running your clinical trials successfully through 2010 and beyond. They will help you to optimize your patient enrollment, reduce your clinical operations costs and minimize your financial liability in the clinical supply chain. In this session, you will:
• Learn what predictive analytics are and what they are not
• Understand why you need predictive analytics to run your clinical trials, and
• Explore how predictive analytics will shape the future of clinical trials

Download Now. 

 



More Podcasts

Job Openings

The University of Washington Department of Genome Sciences is seeking a LINUX SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGER to lead a team in a diverse scientific computing environment that includes multiple HPC systems, petascale storage, and custom application servers. Apply online at UW Hires for req number 61505.  http://www.washington.edu/admin/hr/jobs/

Loading...

For reprints and/or copyright permission, please contact The YGS Group, 3650 West Market Street, York, PA;

(717) 505-9701 ext. 125, or via email to Ashley.Zander@theYGSgroup.com.